14                                        Conclusions and Summary of Environmental Outcomes

14.1                                  Introduction

This Section summarises the environmental outcomes associated with the construction and operation of the Project.

14.2                                  Air Quality

14.2.1                            Construction Phase

Construction dust generating from the soil excavation, embankment construction, dry weather flow interception works, landscaping works, patrol road and boundary fence re-provisioning and odour from dredging and handling of river sediment are the key air quality concerns during construction phase. 

With the implementation of the recommended dust control measures and good construction site practices, the construction of the Project will not cause adverse dust and air quality impacts.  Dust monitoring during the construction stage is recommended to ensure compliance with the Air Quality Objectives.

The measured acid volatile sulphide (AVS) concentrations in the sediment samples of the Project Site were well below that for the remediated sediments, which are considered to have minimum odour impact to the surrounding environment.  The dredged sediment will be stored in enclosed tanks and will be delivered off-site for disposal at regular intervals.  Therefore, potential odour impact due to dredging and handling of river sediment will be minimal.

14.2.2                            Operation Phase

The frequency and scale of maintenance dredging required along the river channel and the flood retardation pond is anticipated to be very small compared with the dredging works during the capital works.  Besides, the dry weather flow interception works to be carried out under this Project will convey the untreated sewage from Shenzhen side (which are currently discharging to the Shenzhen River) to the sewage treatment work at Shenzhen.  It is therefore expected that the water and sediment quality of the Study Area will be improved after completion of the Project.  The potential odour emissions due to the dredging and handling of sediment associated with maintenance activity will be minimal.  With the infrequent dredging activities required, limited quantity of sediments dredged and limited number of truck trips at Shenzhen side or marine vessels required, no adverse cumulative air quality impact is anticipated.

14.3                                  Construction Noise

Owing to the close proximity of some of the NSRs to the works areas of the Project, mitigation measures are required to be implemented to mitigate the construction noise impacts.  Practicable mitigation measures, including good construction site practices, use of quiet PME, movable noise barriers and scheduling of PME/construction activities, are recommended.  With the implementation of mitigation measures, the mitigated construction noise levels at the representative NSRs will comply with the construction noise criterion of 75 dB(A) throughout the construction period.  Noise monitoring during the construction stage is recommended to ensure compliance with the noise criterion.

14.4                                  Water Quality

The potential sources of water quality impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Project have been identified and the potential impacts were evaluated using proven mathematical models.  The modelling has assessed a number of scenarios (including a number of worse case scenarios) for pollutants (including SS, heavy metal, nutrients and micro-organic pollutants) releases from the construction activities, and maintenance dredging and the change of the hydrodynamic conditions of the river during the operation of the Project.   

14.4.1                            Construction Phase

Potential impacts arising from the proposed construction works are predicted to be largely confined to the specific works areas.  With proper implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, sediment dispersion is not expected to cause adverse water quality impacts at the identified water sensitive receivers. 

With the implementation of the recommendation mitigation measures, no residual water quality impacts are envisaged due to the construction of the Project.  Nevertheless, a monitoring programme is recommended during construction phase to verify the predictions of the EIA and ensure compliance with the assessment criteria.

14.4.2                            Operation Phase

During the operation phase, changes to hydrodynamic regime within the Project Site are predicted to be beneficial and no adverse impacts are anticipated.  Adverse water quality impacts are not expected at any identified water sensitive receivers due to the operation of the Project.  The scale and volume of the maintenance dredging activity will be significantly smaller than that of the capital construction work.  Adverse water quality impact is not expected.

With the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, no residual water quality impacts are envisaged due to the operation of the Project. 

Cumulative water quality impacts associated with operation of the LT/HYW BCP have been considered, no adverse impact is anticipated.

14.5                                  Terrestrial Ecology

The ecological resources recorded within the Study Area included twelve habitats (woodland [including fung shui woodland], plantation, shrubby grassland, low-lying grassland, marshy low-lying grassland, abandoned agricultural land, cultivated land (dry), wet active agricultural land, stream / river, channel, pond and developed area) of which only two were not found in the Project Site (shrubby grassland and pond).  Low-lying grassland, cultivated land (dry), wet active agricultural land, channel, pond and developed area (including road / path) were considered as having low ecological value, secondary woodland and the stream / river other than the Shenzhen River as having moderate ecological value, fung shui woodland as having high ecological value and the remainder (plantation, shrubby grassland, abandoned agricultural land and Shenzhen River) as having low to moderate ecological value.  One small section of the Ping Yuen River, located within the Study Area but outside the Project Site, was considered of low to moderate ecological value, due to it acting as a possible breeding site for Greater Painted Snipe.  Overall 286 plant species were recorded in the Study Area, only one of which was a species of conservation interest (Incense Tree), which was recorded in the secondary woodland habitat to the south of the Tsung Yuen Ha within the Study Area.  No plant species of conservation interest was recorded within the Project Site.

A total of 38 wildlife species of conservation interest were recorded within the Study Area during the surveys, including six mammal species (Small Indian Civet, East Asian / Malayan Porcupine, Leopard Cat and three unidentified bat species), twenty six bird species (Crested Serpent Eagle, Besra, Black Kite, Common Buzzard, Peregrine Falcon, Greater Spotted Eagle, Bonelli's Eagle, Savanna Nightjar, Emerald Dove, Greater Coucal, Lesser Coucal, Asian Barred Owlet / Cuckoo Owl, Japanese Sparrowhawk, Crested Goshawk and Greater Painted Snipe, Chinese Pond Heron, Black-crowned Night Heron, Grey Heron, Great Egret, Intermediate Egret, Little Egret, Cattle Egret, Little Green Heron, Common Teal, White-breasted Waterhen and Yellow-breasted Bunting), one herpetofauna species (Chinese Bullfrog) and one rare butterfly species Courtesan.  Only thirteen of these species were recorded in the Project Site during the surveys, twelve of them being highly mobile birds (Greater Coucal, Common Buzzard, Peregrine Falcon, Black Kite, Chinese Pond Heron, Black-crowned Night Heron, Grey Heron, Great Egret, Intermediate Egret, Little Egret, Common Teal and White-breasted Waterhen) and the other being the Courtesan butterfly which despite not being as mobile, has an abundance of similar habitat in the immediate vicinity.  Hence, it is anticipated that the impact to these species is low.

The Project will cause some permanent habitat loss.  The Shenzhen River will be disturbed during construction but additional stream/river habitat (> 2ha), woodland habitat (~0.5ha) and riverbank landscaping areas (>4 ha) will be formed after river modification works.  Given the relatively low value of the habitat and the low faunal abundance / diversity in the area, the impact of the Project is anticipated to be low.  With the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures and good construction practice no unacceptable ecological impact is anticipated.

A bird monitoring programme will be undertaken to monitor the effectiveness of the reprovisioned/reinstated habitats during the operation of the Project.  Monitoring of bird abundance and occurrence will be undertaken for one year after the establishment of the landscape plantings of the Project.  

14.6                                  Fisheries

A total of one active fishpond and three abandoned fishponds were identified within the 500 m Study Area of the Project Site.  No direct or indirect negative impacts on the pond fish culture resources are anticipated during the construction or operation of the Project.

14.7                                  Waste Management

14.7.1                            Construction Phase

During the construction phase, the main activities, which will result in the generation of waste, include dredging of river sediment, soil excavation, embankment construction, sewage diversion works, landscaping works, and patrol road and boundary fence re-provisioning.  The waste types associated with these activities include dredged river sediment, C&D materials, chemical waste, sewage and general refuse.

It is estimated that the gross total C&D materials generated from the Advanced Works within the HKSAR will be about 18,750 m3.  About 15,000 m3 will be inert but not suitable fore ruse on site.  These materials will be disposed of in a public fill reception facility in HKSAR.  A small quantity of about 3,750 m3 of construction waste (non-inert C&D material) will be disposed of at the NENT Landfill.

It is estimated that a gross total excavated materials generated from the river modification and associated works will be about 690,200m3, comprising 95,000 m3 of river sediment, 586,000 m3 of inert C&D material and 9,200 m3 of non-inert C&D material (construction waste).  For the 95,000 m3 river sediment, about 27,000 m3 with all contaminants levels not exceeding the LCEL (Category L) will be disposed of at Huangmao Dao in Zhuhai and the remaining sediments (with Categories M and H) of 68,000 m3 will be disposed of at the Type 1 (dedicated) and Type 2 marine disposal facilities as appropriate within the HKSAR, to be determined by the MFC of the CEDD.  Of the 595,200 m3 C&D materials, about 586,000 m3 are inert in nature.  About 114,800 m3 of these inert C&D materials will be reused on site for backfilling or embankment construction and the surplus inert C&D materials of about 471,200 m3 will be disposed of at Huangmao Dao (黃茅島) in Zhuhai.  About 9,200 m3 of construction waste (non-inert materials) will be generated and require disposed of at landfills in Shenzhen.

For the disposal of C&D material, the Shenzhen River Regulation Office and the DSD shall obtain confirmation from the Public Fill Committee (PFC) in Hong Kong and the Shenzhen Marine Management Office (深圳海洋管理處) for the proposed disposal arrangement before the commencement of the construction works.  Construction work will only be proceeded after all issues on management of C&D material have been resolved and all relevant arrangements have been endorsed by the relevant authorities, including EPD, PFC and the Shenzhen Marine Management Office.

For the disposal of dredged sediment, The Shenzhen River Regulation Office and the DSD will obtain confirmation from the MFC in Hong Kong and the Shenzhen Marine Management Office (深圳海洋管理處) for the proposed disposal arrangement before the commencement of the construction works.  Dredging work will only be proceeded after all issues on management of dredged sediments have been resolved and all relevant arrangements have been endorsed by the relevant authorities, including EPD, MFC and the Shenzhen Marine Management Office.

During the peak construction period, approximately 878.5 kg per day of general refuse will be generated (195 kg from Advanced Works and 682.5 kg from River Modification and Associated Works).  General refuse will be disposed of at landfills in Shenzhen or at NENT Landfill in the HKSAR (for the Advanced Works).  Provided that the general refuse are properly collected and disposed of at regular intervals, no adverse environmental impacts are envisaged.

Chemical waste will be handled in accordance with the Code of Practice on the Packaging, Handling and Storage of Chemical Wastes.  For the Advanced Works, the chemical waste will be collected by a licensed chemical waste collector to the Chemical Waste Treatment Facility for disposal.  For the river modification and the associated works, the chemical waste will be collected and disposed of at licensed hazardous waste treatment facilities in Shenzhen.

With the implementation of general good construction site practices, it is not anticipated that the construction of the Project will cause adverse environmental impacts due to handling, transportation and disposal of the wastes.

14.7.2                            Operation Phase

Maintenance dredging will be carried out along the river channel and the flood retardation pond.  The scale of the dredging work is anticipated to be small and hence the volume of sediment is expected to be less than that of the dredging works during the construction phase.  The disposal and handling of the dredged materials will follow the requirement in the ETWB TC(W) No. 34/2002.

With the implementation of general good construction site practices, it is not anticipated that the operation of the Project will cause adverse environmental impacts due to handling, transportation and disposal of the wastes

14.8                                  Land Contamination

In the vicinity of the Project area, a few potential commercial and industrial developments were identified during the site surveys.  These included abandoned poultry/livestock farms, a plant nursery, a non-operating industrial facility (a bean curd stick production plant) with an air emission stack, a police station with a dangerous goods store, and a pumping station for the Ping Yuen River.  The potential land contamination risks of these facilities to the Project area were assessed and identified only one site required intrusive site investigation to confirm if the soil is contaminated.  Based on the soil analytical results, it is concluded that there is no significant contamination at the identified potential site of land contamination.  All results were below the respective Risk Based Remediation Goals (RBRGs) – Rural Residential for the parameters tested.  As no groundwater was present at the sampling depth of 3 m (bgs), groundwater samples were not retrieved.  There is no risk to humans from the handling of the excavated soil and therefore no further assessment or remediation of soil is required.

As the result of the above, no potential impact from the contaminated soil is anticipated.

14.9                                  Cultural Heritage Impact

Literature review and field surveys identified no Declared Monument and government historic sites within the CHIA Study Area of this Project.  Five graded historic buildings, one nil grade historic building, sixteen built structures, seven graves and four cultural/historical landscape features are identified within the CHIA Study Area and a small quantity of fragmented secondary archaeological deposits were identified from archaeological survey at Chuk Yuen and Pak Fu Shan sections of the Project.

Nevertheless, the identified built heritage features will not be directly or indirectly impacted by the proposed development as they are located far from the Project Site.  No mitigation measure or monitoring will be required during the construction and operation phases of the Project.  

The archaeological survey identified only the secondary archaeological deposits at Chuk Yuen and Pak Fu Shan sections of the Project.  The chance of finding in situ archaeological deposits is very low.  Thus, no impact on significant archaeological resources is anticipated and no archaeological monitoring is required.  Other sections have been identified with no archaeological potential where no impact is anticipated, thus no archaeological monitoring is required.  Pursuant to the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance, the project proponent should inform the AMO immediately in case of discovery of antiquities or supposed antiquities in the course of soil excavation works in construction stage.

However, it should be noted that the archaeological impact assessment covered only the works area assigned as at the date of this report.  If the works boundary changes in later stage to cover additional area not covered in the EIA, the need for further archaeological survey and subsequent impact assessment should be reviewed and AMO should be consulted.

14.10                              Landscape and Visual Impact

With regard to LIA, a total of 18 LRs and four LCAs have been identified in the Study Area.  There will be moderate or slight residual landscape impacts on eight LCAs/LRs as detailed below

The significance of residual, adverse landscape impacts on LCA 4 (Natural River and Floodplain Landscape), LR2 (Natural Watercourse) and LR8 (Shrubby Grassland on Lowland) is moderate.

The significance of residual, adverse landscape impacts on LCA 1 (Settled Agricultural Lowland Landscape), LR4 (Woodland on Hillside), LR5 (Woodland on Lowland), LR9 (Active Farmland) and LR10 (Inactive Farmland) is slight.

Upon mitigation, at day 1 of operation, the significance of residual, adverse impact on one LCA and two LRs is moderate (LCA4 (Natural River and Floodplain Landscape), LR2 (Natural Watercourse) and LR8 (Shrubby Grassland on Lowland)).  The significance of residual, adverse impact on five LCA/LRs is slight (LCA 1 (Settled Agricultural Lowland Landscape), LR4 (Woodland on Hillside), LR5 (Woodland on Lowland), LR9 (Active Farmland), LR10 (Inactive Farmland)).  The significance of residual impacts on the thirteen other LCAs/LRs is insignificant (LCA 2 (Natural Vegetated Hillside Landscape), LCA 3 (Channelised Watercourse Landscape), LR1 (Channelised Watercourse), LR3 (Pond), LR6 (Fung Shui Forest), LR7 (Shrubby Grassland on Hillside), LR11 (Commercial Farm), LR12 (Village Area), LR13 (Traditional Village Area), LR14 (Abandoned Village Area), LR15 (Temple), LR16 (Rural Built/Open Storage Area) and LR17 (Ongoing Development)) with the exception of the residual landscape impact on LR 18 (Roads) which is insignificant if not slightly beneficial.  At year 10 of operation, when planted and natural vegetation has had time to mature all residual impacts for these LRs are either slight or insignificant, and the residual impact on LR 18 (Roads) remains insignificant if not slightly beneficial.

The Project has insignificant residual landscape impacts on all other insignificant.

With regard to VIA, five VSRs representing two categories (residents and travellers) have been identified in the visual envelope to represent key visually sensitive receivers in the area.  Photomontages have been constructed at three VPs in three of these VSRs to help illustrate the visual impact of the Project.  A further two planned VSRs have been identified: the future residents of the re-sited Chuk Yuen Village and the future travellers through the LT/HYW BCP. 

At construction phase, the unmitigated impacts identified are significant for three VSRs (residents of Ta Kwu Ling Village, Residents of Kaw Liu Village and Residents of the current Chuk Yuen Village), moderate for two VSRs (Travellers along Lin Ma Hang Road, and Residents of Tsung Yuen Ha), slight for one VSR (future residents of the re-sited Chuk Yuen Village) and not applicable for one planned VSR (Travellers through the LT/HYW BCP).  After mitigation the significance of all the visual impacts will have been reduced, with the exception of the residents of the re-sited Chuk Yuen village who may still suffer slight visual impacts.  Therefore residual impact at construction is moderate for three VSRs (residents of Ta Kwu Ling Village, Residents of Kaw Liu Village and Residents of the current Chuk Yuen Village) and slight for three VSRs (Travellers along Lin Ma Hang Road, Residents of Tsung Yuen Ha and future Residents of the re-sited Chuk Yuen Village).

At operation phase, the unmitigated impacts identified are moderate for three VSRs (residents of Ta Kwu Ling Village, Residents of Kaw Liu Village and Residents of the current Chuk Yuen Village if this village is still in existence at this location) and slight for four VSRs (Travellers along Lin Ma Hang Road, Residents of Tsung Yuen Ha, future Residents of the re-sited Chuk Yuen Village and future Travellers through LT/HYW BCP).  There are no significant impacts for the operation phase, even without mitigation.

Following the implementation of the proposed visual mitigation measures, at day 1 of operation, the mitigated impacts are slight for four VSRs (Residents of Ta Kwu Ling Village, Residents of Kaw Liu Village, Travellers along Lin Ma Hang Road and Residents of the current Chuk Yuen Village if the village is still in existence); and insignificant for the two VSRs (Residents of Tsung Yuen Ha and future Residents of the re-sited Chuk Yuen Village).  The LT/HYW BCP will not be operational at this point, so the visual impact on Travellers through the LT/HYW BCP is not applicable.  At year 10 of operation, when planted and natural vegetation has had time to mature all residual impacts are insignificant, including for Travellers through the LT/HYW BCP which will be operational by this time.

According to Annex 10 of the EIAO-TM, the landscape and visual impacts of this Project are considered acceptable with mitigation.

14.11                              EM&A Requirement

Monitoring of dust, noise and water quality has been recommended at designated sensitive receivers during the River Modification and Associated Works.  Environmental site audit shall be conducted throughout the construction phase for both River Modification Works and Associated Works and Advanced Works to ensure that the proposed mitigation measures are implemented, and completed landscape works will be monitored during a one-year establishment period. 

A bird monitoring programme will be undertaken to monitor the effectiveness of the reprovisioned/reinstated habitats during the operation of the Project.  Monitoring of bird abundance and occurrence will be undertaken for one year after the establishment of the landscape plantings of the Project.

14.12                              Overall Conclusion

The environmental impact assessment has concluded that no unacceptable environmental impacts are envisaged as a result of the construction and operation of the Project, provided that the recommended mitigation measures are implemented. 

14.13                              Key Environmental Outcomes

14.13.1                        Population and Environmentally Sensitive Areas Protected

The Project improves the flood prevention performance of the Shenzhen River and safeguards the livelihood of settlements along the river from flooding.

The EIA has concluded there are no residual impacts as a result of the construction and operation of the Project.  With the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, the population in the Ta Kwu Ling area are effectively protected from environmental nuisance.

There are no environmentally sensitive areas in the vicinity of the Project Site.  The water quality impact assessment concluded that there will be no adverse impact to the Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site and Mai Po Marshes and Inner Deep Bay SSSI which are located more than 10 km downstream of the Project Site.

14.13.2                        Environmentally Friendly Design Options and Features

Environmentally Friendly Design Option

This preferred design option maintains the existing profile of the concerned section of the Shenzhen River as far as possible to minimise alternation to the existing river profile and meandering nature, minimise landtake and avoid large amounts of excavation, dredging or filling.  The design principle of the works is to protect the livelihood of residents on both sides of the river with an ecological sensible design, which should maintain the naturalness of the river and riparian habitats and hence protect the biodiversity.  Te designed alignment will follow the existing watercourse as far as possible

Environmental Friendly Features

The environmental friendly design features of the Project include:

·       Keep existing meandering profile so as to maintain the existing landscape as far as possible;

·       Keep meanders at bending location to act as a floodplain; and

·       Provide wetland habitat in the flood retardation pond.

14.13.3                        Key Environmental Problems Avoided

The design principle adopted for the Project minimised the alteration to the river and thus minimising the environmental impacts to the environmental sensitive receivers. 

14.13.4                        Environmental Protection Measures and Precautionary Measures

Mitigation measures and good site practices have been recommended through the impact assessment to minimise the potential impacts to the environment.  The Project will unavoidably impact a small area of woodland/plantation habitat.  Compensation of woodland plantation with native species within the Project Site has been recommended.  Proper ecological design will be adopted for the landscape works along the river banks and flood retardation pond.  With the adoption of ecological design, the landscaping works at the river banks of the concerned channelised section of the Shenzhen River can provide ecological function and linkage to the surrounding habitats.